Latest Sectors News

SAIL anticipates a minor effect on its steel prices due to the West Asia crisis. The company is arranging new shipping paths to ensure a steady flow of essential raw materials like limestone from Dubai. SAIL chairman Ashok Panda highlighted that securing raw material availability is paramount for continuous operations. View More

New Delhi: SAIL expects the West Asia crisis to have a marginal impact on its steel prices and is establishing alternative shipping routes to ensure uninterrupted supply of raw material from the region, said SAIL chairman Ashok Panda . The company buys raw material, such as limestone, from Dubai. "So far as SAIL is concerned, we will have some impact with respect to the fluxes, limestone, etc, which we are buying from Dubai. So, the CFR (cost and freight) cost is going to go up, because it was around $23-24, now it will be around $35," he said, adding that overall, in sellable steel, its impact will be hardly ₹100 or ₹200. Panda said in times of crisis, availability of raw material is crucial rather than their cost for uninterrupted operations, and that SAIL is working towards tying up with parties to secure larger quantities from West Asia through diverted routes. "It is more of a raw material security than a price increase. We are working towards tying up with parties to get more quantities from the Middle East through diverted routes," he said. .Pbanner{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;background-color:#ec1c40;margin-top:20px;padding:5px 10px;border-radius:4px;color:#fff;line-height:10px;} .Pbannertext{display:flex;align-items:center;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannertext img{height:20px;margin:0 6px} .Pbannerbutton a{display:flex;align-items:center;background-color:#fff;color:#ec1c40;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;padding:4px 8px;border-radius:6px;font-size:15px;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannerbutton img{height:20px;margin-right:6px} .Pbannerbutton a:hover{background-color:#f7f7f7} Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source Add Now! (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

These three expected deals will define 2026 and maybe even 2027. Here's my advice on how to play them. View More

A couple of years ago, I hit it big at the ponies in an obscure northern track. I met one of the executives there. We took some swell pictures and we now exchange holiday greetings. Out of character, I received a text from him this week. He wants to buy some SpaceX no matter what. Not that long after, a guard near the New York Stock Exchange stopped me. He said he wanted to know how much SpaceX he should buy. Then my colleague in the gardening business was puzzled over the notion of what might be worth sacrificing to make room. Microsoft ? Salesforce ? Logical choices, save for the big Friday manipulation in those stocks that was so enjoyable for those of us with these positions. Let's step back for a second, though. There's not one, but three expected deals that will define 2026 and maybe even 2027. Although, after the rapid-fire fundraise by Anthropic — a near triple from February, not easy when your prior valuation was already north of $300 billion — things seem pretty shot-gunned. Elon Musk's SpaceX is in pole position and is supposed to debut within two weeks. ChatGPT creator OpenAI may be next simply because it needs the money. It smells like more than a trillion-dollar valuation, given it can't afford to have a down round and secured a $852 billion post-money valuation in March. That could be a tall order given its heavy losses and erratic leadership. Anthropic is buttoned up and profitable. If it's the third to go public, it might be worth waiting, if only because A) it can afford to wait and B) the money from the track exec, Wall Street guard and the handyman gardener may be spent and there's no more to come. To be sure, only SpaceX has officially released its initial public offering prospectus known as an S-1. CNBC has reported OpenAI is working on a confidential filing , while others suggest Anthropic could come public as soon as the fourth quarter. With those caveats established, let's dig into these to see if we can make sense of what will happen here. I want to go high level, using the best info that I can muster from my time doing syndicate work on IPOs — on both the sell-side and buy-side of things — and my knowledge of the current state of play from the executives nominally in charge of the process. First, no matter what you hear, see or learn, it is most likely wrong because no one — no matter how high up — has any idea how things will go. One of the reasons is too many cooks in the kitchen. Take SpaceX. Musk has an iron hand, and he wants there to be plenty of retail participation and he wants a valuation of at least $1.8 trillion — at least for now. This is absurd. How are we defining retail? Are close associates of early investor Ron Baron's funds considered retail? How about the loyalist Cathie Wood? How much are they getting? We all thought Musk would choose Morgan Stanley as the lead bank for the IPO, given the firm stuck its neck out for the Twitter-now-X buyout. Maybe it all worked out, and they said let's "call it even." Turns out, Goldman Sachs is the lead bank on the deal, which is good for us at the Club because the fees should be huge. But Goldman's syndicate desk knows little about retail. Then again, maybe Fidelity counts as retail? Perhaps a big slug is promised to Robinhood for its users? Seems like the stock jumped inordinately Friday, but there is nothing that's really "inordinate" in the wild west that the market has become. I have a good word to frame the deal: chaos. With chaos comes one thing: losses. So let's play out what will happen. It's a three-step process. First, the pricing, ostensibly where the $1.8 trillion valuation comes from. Second, the opening and first day of trading, where the total guesswork comes from. Third, the likely early inclusion into major U.S. stock indexes such as the Nasdaq 100 , thanks to rule changes by those in charge of them. This is the really fraught portion because it has never happened and nobody knows what will happen — something you could see late in Friday's session when rebalancing caused Club name Nvidia's stock to fall apart in the final 10 minutes of trading. Let's put our "1999 hats" on because that's the last time we had the level of ignorance we've got now. I have been saying we have to leave room in our imaginations for SpaceX to quickly become worth as much as $4 trillion when taking into account all of the market orders put in by those who got no stock on the deal. A market order tells your broker to immediately buy or sell at the best available price. In the SpaceX frenzy, they will have no idea what price they will be buying at. They will just be buying. We have a template from recent history: the much-admired IPO of Cerebras , an analogue of Nvidia, the latter being the punching bag of the process. Cerebras shares were priced at $185 , which valued the company at $56 billion on a fully diluted basis. The deal was reportedly 20 times oversubscribed, meaning 20 times the demand for the number of shares being offered. We don't know the allocations, but the stock opened at $350, almost 90% above the deal price. Cerebras briefly supported a valuation north of $100 billion when the stock touched $386. Well, the stock is now at $237 a share, meaning everyone who bought in what we call "the after market" is now under water. Yes, the unthinkable. Everyone's a loser, except for those who "got in" on the deal with allocations at the $185 price. Even those people could be losers if they gave the syndicate desk some "at the market" orders to help the cause and secure additional stock. Their blended average may put them underwater, too. Which brings us to the first lesson: you might actually lose money on this piece of business if you do it wrong. That's why you want to try to get as much as you can on the deal — just call your broker and try, it will be worth the effort — and then beg off. No market orders. Let it play out, like you would trying to catch a tarpon. The stock will fly away then tire and come in, so you can buy it then. If not, just wait. I think because of a flood of at-the-market orders and the knowledge of the company because of Musk, you can expect at least double the double you got on Cerebras, which means that you could anticipate a $4 trillion price point that first day after the chaotic opening. You do not want to be a part of that scrum other than as a seller if you got stock. If you are, unfortunately, hung because of your lack of faith in my analysis or your overexuberance, you might have a chance to buy in a surprising way. The keepers of various indexes are going to machine gun SpaceX into their devices. In order to do that, you can expect a huge drawdown from all other stocks, especially megacap names like Nvidia, Apple and Microsoft . That's where the money is. They will get clubbed, and I would say that's a great time to buy, but we don't know how close the other two deals will come. They could create similar selling pressure on these other names. The newly public stocks will pop on admission and then drop after joining the index. If you don't get any stock on the SpaceX deal, perhaps that would be the time to think about buying. Will it be worth buying at all? Again, on the deal, yes. After the deal, not likely in the short run. There will be multiple tranches of insider stock peeling off as part of the novel way the deal is structured. You can expect a pummeling each time because nobody knows what is going to happen, including Musk and the bank syndicate desks, as you must remember the whole thing is very much like 1999. Will it be a good stock? That actually depends on the fundamentals . The company is losing so much money that I think you may only want it for bragging rights until it is through the process and is seasoned. It will not be an earnings story. The next one on the chute will most likely be OpenAI. Here's a company that does not share the marquee of Musk. It has the personality of CEO Sam Altman, who is hard to figure out, and I am being extremely diplomatic. This one will be an actual fundraise because OpenAI needs the money. Again, if you can get in on the deal at the offer price, take it. If you can't, don't bother. You could have a Cerebras situation on your hands. This will be a traditional piece of business from a money-losing company, which means I expect it to be a money-losing IPO. I predict that your best price might be after the inclusion of the indexes. I would love to be more optimistic, but when a company needs the money, the institutions who get in on the deal will be sellers. They have to consider the company's prospects, which means they would rather not own it. Finally, there is my favorite, Anthropic, a business-to-business company that is perhaps the fastest-growing company of all time, at least at this scale. It's annual revenue run rate has crossed $47 billion, up from $10 billion in revenue last year. And it's on pace to turn an operating profit this quarter, according to The Wall Street Journal . You have to play by a different set of rules here. You will most likely not get any stock on the deal. The first price will not be the highest price. If you want to try getting some stock, I strongly urge the use of a limit order , which gives your broker a specific price to buy or sell a stock. Pick a limit by dollar. Maybe say you will not pay a per-share price that is above the price of an Nvidia share. You calculate that price and you put in your limit order at that level. You do not use a market order, even if the opening will most likely not be the highest price of the day. You may have to be like a successful Cerebras holder flipping it at $380. At the least, because Anthropic is such a terrific company, I don't expect the kind of losses that the Cerebras market buyers are now experiencing. Because I like Anthropic so much, I might have to break discipline on one of my buys, just to be sure I get some that first day. But if I wanted 200 shares, I would not buy more than 50 because I do fear some Cerebrus action. You can buy 50 at any price, provided it is worth less than Nvidia, which is another extremely fast growing company with a very low price-to-earnings multiple on 2027 consensus estimates. In the end, these three will be governed by their fundamentals. Go back over SpaceX — a money-losing Musk wunderkind — and expect that there will be a gulf, if not a gulch, where you will have to ride through, but it might actually be worth it to buy some if it breaks below its opening price and then where the deal came. All possibilities. You can console yourself that you are buying Musk's dreams. It could work, unlikely, but it could be like owning a share of the Green Bay Packers until it nears some sort of profitability. OpenAI is the hardest to game because I hate paying up for money-losing companies, except ones run by Musk. We all know what he's done for Tesla believers. OpenAI may need to offer a huge amount of stock so it can last long enough to get it to where it is losing less money. That's the real guesswork. The computing power needs, the competition from Anthropic, the potential for a more business-to-business stream of revenue, the fear that all of the big institutions that own it will want to cash out, makes this one plain fraught. If you want to make money in it, then think of where Cerebras is now. I know, it sounds dire. Look, there's an obvious twofold nature here — I want to make you money and not lose you money. Finally, if Anthropic is the third to go public, remember the market will be severely depleted of cash. The deal will, per se, be cheaper than if it were to come, say, first or even second. The company is a money maker. The big mutual funds will want the stock on the deal, at the opening price and even after that. I bet the low will be the price the stock opens. Yes, it will be that good. So good that I will want it for the Charitable Trust. Enough said. (Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust is long MSFT, CRM, NVDA, and AAPL. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.

JSW Steel’s improved operating metrics, higher capacity and lighter balance sheet will be utilised to drive further growth View More

The miner's Congo copper assets and Papua New Guinea ambitions are central to a strategy aimed at reducing reliance on a single commodity and geography, with the business expected to generate ?500-700 crore in Ebitda in FY27. View More

Newly appointed chairman says the steel major is establishing alternative shipping routes to ensure uninterrupted supply of raw material from the region View More

Berkshire's widely held B shares are now running 16.3 percentage points behind the benchmark index year-to-date, the biggest gap so far in 2026. View More

In this articleBRK.B.SPXCSXBRK.BFollow your favorite stocksCREATE FREE ACCOUNT (This is the Warren Buffett Watch newsletter, news and analysis on all things Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway. You can sign up here to receive it every Friday evening in your inbox.) Berkshire trails red-hot S&P by biggest margin so far this year With hot tech stocks fueling its solid 5.1% gain in May, the S&P 500 closed Friday at a fresh record high.In a sharp contrast, shares of Berkshire Hathaway were close to unchanged for the month.As a result, Berkshire's widely held B shares are now running 16.3 percentage points behind the benchmark index year-to-date, the biggest gap so far in 2026. Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards At the end of March, Berkshire had a small winning margin of 1.8 percentage points over the S&P.But then the S&P zoomed more than 35% higher in April and May while Berkshire fell almost 11%. Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards Great expectations for AI profits, and massive spending to build the infrastructure needed to generate all that future artificial intelligence, have been sending the tech stocks that dominate the market-capitalization-weighted S&P sharply higher.Berkshire, on the other hand, is extremely conservative with minimal exposure to AI, nearly $400 billion in cash, and solidly profitable, but not spectacular, operating companies.If enthusiastic AI investments turn out to be a bubble, (the concept has its own Wikipedia page), as some have been warning (for months), that caution may well pay off over time, as it did when Warren Buffett avoided the high-flying internet stocks of the late 1990s.While its overall AI exposure remains relatively small, it does appear new CEO Greg Abel did, in a decidedly un-Buffett-like move, triple the company's Alphabet stake during the first quarter. At almost $22 billion, it is the fifth largest equity holding in the portfolio. Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards Berkshire shares are now down 12% since their all-time closing high in May of last year, just before Buffett revealed he planned to step down as CEO at the end of 2025.According to a chart analysis by 22V Research, as reported by CNBC.com, Berkshire's relative performance ratio vs. the S&P has dropped to its lowest levels since 2007.In a note to clients, the firm said, "Berkshire Hathaway was a good bellwether for the S&P, but that relationship appears to be changing." Regulatory delay for railroad merger opposed by Berkshire's BNSF The U.S. Surface Transportation Board is pausing its review of the proposed $85 billion merger between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern.The regulator, which has final say over whether the companies will be able to create the country's first transcontinental freight railroad, wants more information from them by late July on how the tie-up would affect competition.UNP and NSC already had to file a revised application in April after their first proposal was rejected in January.Now the STB says, "Several aspects of the revised application... are unclear or underdeveloped and require supplementation at this stage."A final decision may be delayed until the fall of 2027. A display for the BNSF Railway at the Berkshire Hathaway Annual Shareholder Meeting in Omaha, Nebraska.Yun Li | CNBC Berkshire's BNSF, which has been critical of the merger from the start as anti-competitive, is part of the Stop the Rail Merger Coalition recently formed by rival railroads, customers, and labor unions.Last August, BNSF announced a "collaboration" with CSX to provide "seamless, efficient, coast-to-coast solutions to ship between the western and eastern U.S."A few days later, Buffett shot down speculation Berkshire would counter the UNP-NSC deal with a bid to acquire CSX, telling CNBC the company was not in the market to buy any railroad. BUFFETT & BERKSHIRE AROUND THE INTERNET Some links may require a subscription:Wall Street Journal on MSN: He's Berkshire Hathaway's other Charlie, the heir to its insurance juggernautReuters: Berkshire-owned Jazwares must face trademark lawsuit over Squishmallows 'Hug Mees'Bloomberg: Warren Buffett's Shareholder Letters Make a Surprisingly Great Book TheStreet: Berkshire Hathaway's latest stock purge sends a clear messageSnopes: Did Warren Buffett warn of Trump declaring martial law and 'canceling' democracy? Here's the truth [No]Fortune on MSN: Warren Buffett says 'you're giving up your potential' if you don't have this one skill—and it has nothing to do with the stock market HIGHLIGHTS FROM CNBC'S BUFFETT ARCHIVE 'I don't have to bet' on technology companies (1999) As the dotcom bubble was inflating, Warren Buffett said he would rather invest in traditional companies like Coca-Cola instead of techs like Microsoft because he's "perfectly willing to trade away a big payoff for a certain payoff." watch nowVIDEO0:0000:00"I don't have to bet" on technology companies1999 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting AUDIENCE MEMBER: I know you like to buy into success stories, but you don't like to buy high tech.And it seems to me, say, in the case of Microsoft, that 10 years from now they'll be doing software development, just like 10 years from now Coke will be selling sugared water.And what I'm wondering is, why you feel that way when it seems certain companies, high-tech companies, are predictable...WARREN BUFFETT: I think it's much easier to predict the relative strength that Coke will enjoy in the soft drink world than the strength — the amount of strength — that Microsoft will possess in the software world.That's not to knock Microsoft at all. If I had to bet on anybody, I'd certainly bet on Microsoft, bet heavily if I had to bet. But I don't have to bet. And I don't see that world as clearly as I see the soft drink world.Now somebody that has a lot of familiarity with software may very well see it that way and they're entitled to — if it's true they have superior knowledge and they act on it, they're entitled to make money from that superior knowledge. There's nothing wrong with that.I know I don't have that kind of knowledge, and I simply — and I do think that it's — that if you have a general knowledge of business over decades, that you would regard the industry they're in as less predictable than the soft drink industry.Now it may also be that even though it's less predictable that there's a whole lot more money to be made, so that if you're right, that the payoff is much larger.But we are perfectly willing to trade away a big payoff for a certain payoff. And that's the way we're put together.It does not knock the ability of other people to make those decisions.I mean, I asked — first time I met Bill Gates in 1991, I said, "If you're going to go away on a desert island for 10 years, you had to put your stock in two companies in the high-tech business, which would they be?"And he named two very good stocks. And if I'd bought both of them, we'd have made a lot more money than we made, even buying Coca-Cola.But he also would have said at the same time that if he went away, he'd rather buy Coca-Cola, because he would have felt sure about that happening.It's — you know, different people understand different businesses. And the important thing is to know which ones you do understand and when you're operating within what I call your "circle of competence."And the software business is not within my circle of competence, and I don't think it's within in Charlie's.Charlie?CHARLIE MUNGER: Well, I certainly agree with that. I think there are interesting questions, too, about how far the whole field can go...I don't know what happens once you get unlimited bandwidth into the house and way more options, and —Beyond a certain point, it strikes me that there might be a surfeit of anybody's interest in the field.I don't know where that point is, whether it's 20 years out or 30 years out, but it would affect me a little.  BERKSHIRE STOCK WATCH Four weeks Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards Twelve months Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards BRK.A stock price: $710,900.00BRK.B stock price: $474.48BRK.B P/E (TTM): 14.13Berkshire market capitalization: $1,022,973,515,650Berkshire Cash as of March 31: $397.4 billion (Up 6.5% from Dec. 31)Excluding Rail Cash and Subtracting T-Bills Payable: $380.2 billion (Up 3.0% from Dec. 31)Berkshire repurchased $234 million of its shares in Q1 2026.(All figures are as of the date of publication, unless otherwise indicated) BERKSHIRE'S TOP EQUITY HOLDINGS - May 29, 2026 Zoom In IconArrows pointing outwards Berkshire's top holdings of disclosed publicly traded stocks in the U.S. and Japan, by market value, based on the latest closing prices.Holdings are as of March 31, 2026, as reported in Berkshire Hathaway's 13F filing on May 15, 2026, except for:Mitsubishi, which is as of April 30, 2026The full list of holdings and current market values is available from CNBC.com's Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio Tracker. QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS Please send any questions or comments about the newsletter to me at alex.crippen@nbcuni.com. (Sorry, but we don't forward questions or comments to Buffett himself.)If you aren't already subscribed to this newsletter, you can sign up here.Also, Buffett's annual letters to shareholders are highly recommended reading. There are collected here on Berkshire's website.-- Alex Crippen, Editor, Warren Buffett Watch Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

The approval positions Andhra Pradesh as the first state to roll out an industry partnership under PM-SETU View More

ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India secured the first Strategic Investment Plan approval under the Pradhan Mantri Skilling and Employability Transformation through Upgraded ITIs scheme. This marks a significant step in modernizing vocational education through industry partnerships. Andhra Pradesh leads as the first state to operationalize an industry partnership under the PM-SETU initiative. The program aims to transform 1,000 government ITIs nationwide. View More

New Delhi: ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India (AM/NS India) has become the first company to secure approval for a Strategic Investment Plan (SIP) under the Centre's Rs 60,000-crore Pradhan Mantri Skilling and Employability Transformation through Upgraded ITIs ( PM-SETU ) scheme, marking a key milestone in the government's push to modernise vocational education through industry partnerships. The National Steering Committee (NSC), chaired by Skill Development and Entrepreneurship Secretary Debashree Mukherjee, approved the SIP for the Visakhapatnam ITI Cluster in Andhra Pradesh during its third meeting held at Kaushal Bhawan in New Delhi. With the approval, Andhra Pradesh becomes the first state to operationalise an industry partnership under PM-SETU and onboard an Anchor Industry Partner (AIP), setting the stage for industry-led management of government Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs). The move is significant as PM-SETU seeks to transform 1,000 government ITIs across the country through a hub-and-spoke model that places industry at the centre of curriculum design, infrastructure development and workforce training. The Visakhapatnam cluster is expected to serve as a pilot for future collaborations between state governments and industry players, demonstrating how vocational institutions can be aligned more closely with evolving labour market requirements. Live Events The NSC meeting was attended by senior officials from the Directorate General of Training (DGT), Capacity Building Commission (CBC), National Council for Vocational Education and Training (NCVET), and ministries including Commerce and Industry, Heavy Industries, and Labour and Employment. Industry representatives from companies such as Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd , Hero MotoCorp , Bajaj Auto , ITC and AM/NS India also participated, along with development partners including the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank. The committee reviewed the progress of PM-SETU implementation across states and discussed measures to strengthen industry participation, improve institutional governance and enhance the financial sustainability of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) that will manage the projects. According to the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, the approval of the Visakhapatnam cluster marks the first concrete implementation step under PM-SETU and is expected to encourage other states to accelerate their own industry-led skilling initiatives. The government said PM-SETU aims to create a future-ready workforce by modernising training infrastructure, improving employability outcomes and establishing National Centres of Excellence in high-growth sectors such as advanced manufacturing and emerging technologies. Implementation momentum is gathering pace. So far, 32 states and Union Territories have constituted State Steering Committees, while 12 states and UTs have issued Requests for Proposals (RFPs) to invite industry participation for selecting Anchor Industry Partners. Several of these selection processes are nearing completion. The ministry expects more Strategic Investment Plans to come up for approval in the coming months as the programme moves from the planning stage to large-scale execution, supporting the government's broader vision of building a skilled workforce for Viksit Bharat 2047. .Pbanner{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;background-color:#ec1c40;margin-top:20px;padding:5px 10px;border-radius:4px;color:#fff;line-height:10px;} .Pbannertext{display:flex;align-items:center;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannertext img{height:20px;margin:0 6px} .Pbannerbutton a{display:flex;align-items:center;background-color:#fff;color:#ec1c40;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;padding:4px 8px;border-radius:6px;font-size:15px;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannerbutton img{height:20px;margin-right:6px} .Pbannerbutton a:hover{background-color:#f7f7f7} Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source Add Now! (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

Stocks to buy for long term: ICICI Securities' Pankaj Pandey recommends five quality stocks poised for long-term gains. From Artemis Medicare, EIL to Tata Steel, discover the compelling reasons behind these picks and how they can bolster your investment portfolio in the coming years. View More

View More