Latest Sectors News

CNBC's Jim Cramer said Monday the data center trade isn't dead, but its next wave of winners could look very different. View More

watch nowVIDEO2:5202:52Speculative builders are driving up the cost of data center construction, says Jim CramerMad Money with Jim Cramer CNBC's Jim Cramer said Monday the data center trade isn't dead, but its next wave of winners could look very different."The data center thesis, perhaps the greatest investment theme in a generation, is now under attack and it may never be the same," the "Mad Money" host said.Data center stocks have come under pressure as politicians and local communities push back against projects over electricity costs, water use and other concerns. Cramer pointed to Pennsylvania and Texas, where governors who previously supported data center development have recently called for stricter requirements. "We know that rules can be crafted and communities can be appeased, but the unbridled buildout is most likely over," Cramer said. With the pace of development now less certain, Cramer said investors may be unwilling to pay premium valuations for data center beneficiaries such as gas turbine maker GE Vernova and memory companies Micron, Sandisk, Western Digital and Seagate, even if underlying demand remains strong. But the changing landscape could benefit Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and Meta, he noted. Cramer said the hyperscalers have the financial resources to meet tougher regulatory and community requirements that smaller, speculative data-center developers may struggle to afford. "They're the biggest beneficiaries, because they can afford to compensate local communities and get their warehouses full of servers built," Cramer said. Fewer speculative developers could also reduce competition for land, labor and electricity, potentially lowering costs for hyperscalers as they continue building AI infrastructure.For Cramer, the political backlash doesn't mean abandoning the data center trade. Instead, it could shift the advantage toward the largest technology companies capable of continuing to build despite tougher restrictions."They're the winners," Cramer said. "I think they'll keep winning, as they've been the losers when people extrapolate the costs of building these data centers. This political pushback is a godsend for the hyperscalers."Cramer's Charitable Trust, the portfolio run by CNBC's Investing Club, owns shares of AMZN, GEV, GOOGL, META, MSFT, MU. watch nowVIDEO12:2412:24Jim Cramer tracks the winners from the data center rotationMad Money with Jim Cramer Jim Cramer's Guide to InvestingClick here to read Jim Cramer's Guide to Investing at no cost to help you build long-term wealth and invest smarter Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer's every move in the market.DisclaimerQuestions for Cramer? Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBCWant to take a deep dive into Cramer's world? Hit him up! Mad Money Twitter - Jim Cramer Twitter - Facebook - InstagramQuestions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? madcap@cnbc.com Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

The CERC has now replaced the automatic revocation of grid connectivity for delayed renewable energy projects with a compensation based mechanism View More

Avaada Electro is gearing up for an initial public offering aiming to raise up to $800 million. The solar manufacturing company has partnered with several banks to oversee this potential share sale, which will feature new stock along with a secondary sale. This move aligns Avaada Electro with other players in the renewable energy sector striving for capital markets engagement, currently boasting a solar manufacturing capacity of 8.5 gigawatts. View More

Avaada Electro Ltd., the solar manufacturing arm of Avaada Group, is planning to publicly file as early as this month for an initial public offering that could raise as much as $800 million, according to people familiar with the matter. The Brookfield Renewable Partners-backed company has appointed ICICI Securities Ltd., Axis Capital Ltd. , HSBC Holdings Plc, IIFL Capital Services Ltd. and Bank of America Corp. to help manage the potential share sale in India, the people said, asking not to be identified because the information is private. The offering is expected to consist primarily of new shares and also include a secondary sale of shares by existing investors, people said. Deliberations are ongoing and details including the size and timing of the offering could change, the people said. Representatives for Avaada Group and the banks didn’t respond to requests for comment. A representative for Brookfield declined to comment. Avaada Electro filed draft documents through India’s confidential filing route in October 2025 and received regulatory approval in April 2026. Live Events The company is joining a growing list of renewable energy firms seeking to tap India’s capital markets. Continuum Green Energy Ltd. and SAEL Industries Ltd. have received regulatory approval for IPOs, while Sembcorp Green Infra Ltd., Greenko Energies Pvt., Inox Clean Energy Ltd. and Goldi Solar Pvt. are among companies preparing to file draft documents, people familiar with the matters have said. Avaada Electro makes high-efficiency solar photovoltaic cells and modules, according to its website. The company currently operates 8.5 gigawatts of solar-cell manufacturing capacity across Nagpur and Dadri and plans to add 5.1 gigawatts, taking its total module capacity to 13.6 gigawatts. .Pbanner{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;background-color:#ec1c40;margin-top:20px;padding:5px 10px;border-radius:4px;color:#fff;line-height:10px;width: 100%;box-sizing: border-box} .Pbannertext{display:flex;align-items:center;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannertext img{height:20px;margin:0 6px} .Pbannerbutton a{display:flex;align-items:center;background-color:#fff;color:#ec1c40;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;padding:4px 8px;border-radius:6px;font-size:15px;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannerbutton img{height:20px;margin-right:6px} .Pbannerbutton a:hover{background-color:#f7f7f7} Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source Add Now! (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel) (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)

Technology Readiness Level (TRL) is a scale used to assess the maturity of a technology, with TRL 7 indicating that a system prototype has been demonstrated in an operational environment. View More

New Delhi: India is expected to witness significant growth in sodium-ion battery technology as researchers have reached Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 7 and above, Renewable Energy Secretary Santosh Kumar Sarangi said on Friday, noting that the technology could move from pilot projects to commercial production within two to three years. "A lot of research is going on in this area. In sodium-ion batteries , there are researchers who have reached a TRL of 7 and above. Once you reach that stage, moving from a pilot to commercial production should take anywhere between two to three years. So, we should expect significant growth there," Sarangi said responding to a question from on the sidelines of the BNEF Summit. Technology Readiness Level (TRL) is a scale used to assess the maturity of a technology, with TRL 7 indicating that a system prototype has been demonstrated in an operational environment. Sarangi said the government expects alternative battery technologies to play an increasing role as India expands energy storage to support the growing share of renewable energy. On vanadium flow batteries, he said domestic manufacturers are working to develop supply capacity, while growing demand could help bring down costs. Live Events "In vanadium flow batteries, as I mentioned, NTPC Green Energy Limited has placed an order for 100 megawatts. There are domestic manufacturers who are working and ensuring the supply of that capacity," he said. "Once the demand grows and the volume increases, we expect vanadium flow battery prices to fall, and that will be a game changer in the future," Sarangi added. Sarangi said the Central Electricity Authority (CEA) estimates that India would have about 411 GWh of energy storage by 2031-32 and that the country is on track to achieve the requirement earlier. "The CEA estimates suggest that we would have about 411 gigawatt-hours of storage by 2031-32. We are well on track and should, in fact, be able to achieve it before that," he said. He said the current level of storage is lower, but tenders and orders indicate that a significant amount of battery energy storage capacity is already under development. "The current level is less, but if you look at the tenders and placement of orders, about 156 gigawatt-hours of battery energy storage systems are under process and under implementation," Sarangi said. On battery recycling, Sarangi said the government is working on the issue under the existing e-waste framework. "We are working on it. That is part of the e-waste rules. But if further detailing is required, then it will be done," he said. Sarangi also said the government is working on a new scheme to support domestic polysilicon manufacturing, as the capacity expected under the earlier Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme would be limited. "The first one was a PLI scheme where polysilicon, wafers, cells and modules were all part of it. So, a very small capacity is likely to come up as part of that. But since we require a much larger capacity, we are thinking about and working on a scheme that will support the manufacturing of polysilicon," he said. He said India would look at adding at least 30 GW of polysilicon capacity by 2030 to strengthen the country's energy security and manufacturing resilience. "To ensure India's energy security and ensure that India's manufacturing resilience is maintained, a capacity of 30 gigawatts and above should be good for the Indian context. So, we would look at least 30 gigawatts of capacity addition by 2030," Sarangi said. .Pbanner{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;background-color:#ec1c40;margin-top:20px;padding:5px 10px;border-radius:4px;color:#fff;line-height:10px;width: 100%;box-sizing: border-box} .Pbannertext{display:flex;align-items:center;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannertext img{height:20px;margin:0 6px} .Pbannerbutton a{display:flex;align-items:center;background-color:#fff;color:#ec1c40;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;padding:4px 8px;border-radius:6px;font-size:15px;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannerbutton img{height:20px;margin-right:6px} .Pbannerbutton a:hover{background-color:#f7f7f7} Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source Add Now!

Polysilicon is used to make ingots, which are then processed into wafers and used to produce solar cells. View More

The plans for a subsidy push comes as the world’s third largest renewable energy market aims to have a 30 gigawatt (GW) polysilicon capacity by the end of this decade View More

Market experts showed skepticism at whether the push would succeed against a bevy of factors working against Treasurys. View More

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks to members of the media outside the White House in Washington, Aug. 20, 2026.Yuri Gripas | Abaca | Bloomberg | Getty Images Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent insisted Thursday that he has multiple weapons at his disposal to quell liquidity problems in the government debt market and restore calm. While that's true in itself, a two-pronged effort he has deployed so far — accelerated buybacks and an effort to talk the market into accepting the rationale — have met with little success.The Treasury announcement Wednesday that it would at least double its bond buybacks starting in early September sent yields tumbling as investors applauded a backstop for longer-maturity government bonds.However, yields at the long end quickly rose again Thursday as market experts showed skepticism at whether the push would succeed against a bevy of factors working against Treasurys.Then on Thursday, Bessent appeared on CNBC with assurances that the intervention was merely aimed at providing market liquidity and not at trying to control the yield curve. While yields initially nudged lower, they quickly rebounded amid criticism of how the prior day's announcement was rolled out, leading one analyst to characterize the appearance as having "minimal impact" on the market pressures. watch nowVIDEO4:3904:39No panic or worry on Treasury's behalf, says SMBC’s Joe LavorgnaPower Lunch Still, that leaves Bessent with a variety of options that he may yet choose to deploy."We have a big toolkit," the Treasury chief said. "Part of it is signaling here and to show that we believe that the yields don't reflect the underlying fundamentals."Yet markets are still worried, and criticism rose that the size of the buybacks, which Bessent confirmed could exceed $4 billion, would be rendered ineffective in such a large market.Evercore ISI analyst Krishna Guha called the plan "a weak form of Operation Twist," or a Federal Reserve initiative that swaps longer-term notes and bonds for short-term bills. The move "in itself will have little enduring impact and could backfire if it is seen as signaling concern about the ability to fund longer-term at acceptable cost," he said. The interview "had minimal impact on the bond market," he added.That leaves Bessent with a handful of other options, none guaranteed to work and each carrying its own risk:Bigger and more frequent buybacks: Bessent simply could say the initial round of stepped-up buybacks went so well that Treasury is going larger. Smaller auctions: The department simply could cut down on the level of longer-dated debt it is issuing and shift it into shorter-term bills, an approach Bessent criticized strongly when it was employed by his predecessor, Janet Yellen.Change the maturity composition of outstanding debt: This essentially would be a larger-scale version of smaller auctions and would require market participants to snap up shorter-duration — and lower-yielding — debt, a risky proposition. "Global investors know that struggling sovereigns often resort to shorter dated issuance. We think the US is different from all others, but it is not different without limit," Guha, who is Evercore's head of economics and central bank strategy, said in a client note.Invoking the 'Bessent put': Markets already are using the term to describe the Treasury moves, and the secretary can use his tools in an unpredictable manner to keep anyone betting against U.S. debt off guard. "We think this is much more suited to the type of tactical guerilla operation to catch shorts off-guard, impose losses and create a perception of two-sided risk that may slow down a fundamentals-driven move in yields and prevent overshooting — the smoothing version," Guha wrote. "The problem is that this may not have much lasting impact on where yields are a few months from now." Credibility at stake Whichever route he chooses — and he could also choose to do nothing and let the markets sort it out — Bessent could face credibility challenges from a market already growing skeptical and leery of the challenges Treasurys are facing.Jefferies' chief U.S. economist, Thomas Simons, complained that the buyback announcement itself was improper. He pointed out that the move came two weeks after Treasury announced its quarterly refunding plans, during which it gave no indication that it was considering changing the buyback scheme."This breaks with Treasury's long-held strategy of making 'regular and predictable' announcements, and using the Refunding to announce almost all of their policy changes and guidance," Simons wrote. "We do not think it is hyperbole to say that this break in communication strategy reduces the overall credibility of their guidance." watch nowVIDEO19:0819:08Watch CNBC's full interview with Treasury Secretary Scott BessentSquawk on the Street Moreover, Simons added that "the sloppy wording of [the] headline on [the] release gave the impression that this was a hastily made decision."The challenge, then, for Bessent could be that efforts to suppress longer-end yields could give investors another reason to demand more compensation. Factors at play Along the lines of what Bessent told CNBC on Thursday, not all of the factors at play are fundamental. They include rising competition from corporate bond issuance as well as suddenly attractive yields of other sovereigns including Japan; a correlation with oil prices that in turn increases inflation fears; and increasing term premiums, or the extra yield investors are demanding.To combat those problems, Bessent could seek cooperation with the Federal Reserve. Though Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh has stressed the importance of letting the market set rates, Bessent suggested Thursday that the two entities "would work together" in dealing with complications in the bond markets and as the central bank manages its own Treasury holdings.The various moving parts come during a paradigm shift in the government debt markets, both in the U.S. and globally."There has also been a structural shift in who buys U.S. government debt," said Atsi Sheth, chief credit officer at Moody's Ratings. "As central banks shrink their balance sheets and traditional duration buyers reach the limits of how much additional issuance they can absorb, new buyers, such as leveraged hedge funds running relative-value strategies, are playing a bigger role."On top of all that, the U.S. faces a daunting fiscal situation in the form of a deficit-to-GDP ratio of nearly 6%, or about triple its average from the end of World War II until the Covid pandemic. That is compounding a problem with the national debt, which just surpassed $40 trillion.With President Donald Trump hungry for tax cuts and Congress showing few signs of spending restraint, the fiscal problems are likely to mount. To that end, Bessent said he and Russell Vought, head of the Office of Management and Budget, will meet soon to discuss "fiscal consolidation," generally understood to refer to efforts to reduce red ink."It's that combination of the deficits, the borrowing needs, inflation expectations, not really knowing what future Fed policy is going to be, and the sustainability of being able to issue higher, ever higher, levels of U.S. Treasury debt, and what rates those need to be at," said JoAnne Bianco, senior investment strategist at BondBloxx. "There's just the idea that there needs to be a higher risk premium for all the issuance." watch nowVIDEO4:5304:53Former CEA chair Jason Furman: Treasury can't change 'underlying fundamentals' of the curveSquawk on the Street Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Axis Direct is optimistic about NTPC, Skipper, and JSW Energy following their June-quarter results. They believe strong capacity additions and order books will support earnings growth, maintaining 'Buy' ratings and target prices of ?420, ?605, and ?630, respectively. View More

Ola Electric has launched a special offer for the Shakti Gen2 home inverter. The device, available in 3 kW and 6 kW variants, will be offered at discounted price for early buyers. View More

Reliance Industries has proposed a Rs 2.73 lakh crore, 30-year investment to develop an underground coal gasification complex in Andhra Pradesh. The project could convert deep coal into syngas for hydrogen, methanol, ammonia and synthetic natural gas, helping India reduce dependence on imported LNG and chemical feedstocks. However, commercial viability, geological risks and UCG technology at scale remain major challenges. View More

Mukesh Ambani 's Reliance Industries (RIL) has proposed what could become one of India's largest energy and industrial investments -- about Rs 2.73 lakh crore over 30 years to build an integrated underground coal gasification complex in Andhra Pradesh, as reported by ET today. The proposal comes as India tries to extract more value from its huge coal resource while reducing dependence on imported gas and chemical feedstocks. For Reliance, it is a striking new move into coal resources, although the company is not proposing to become a conventional coal miner. Also Read: RIL proposes Rs 2.73 lakh crore investment for India’s first coal gasification complex in Andhra But can Reliance make underground coal gasification work at commercial scale in Indian conditions and, if it does, will the resulting gas and chemicals can materially reduce India's vulnerability to external energy shocks. What Reliance has proposed Reliance has secured the Chintalapudi and Recherla coal blocks in Andhra Pradesh through a coal ministry e-auction and has proposed developing an integrated Underground Coal Gasification, or UCG, complex in Eluru district, as per an ET report based on sources. RIL did not respond to ET's email requesting comment. Live Events The potential investment is pegged at Rs 2.73 lakh crore over 30 years, but it is conditional on exploration establishing that the project is technically and commercially viable. The proposal has three stages. Exploration and pilot work from Q3 2026 to Q4 2027 would involve up to Rs 3,000 crore. If that succeeds, Reliance proposes Rs 1.2 lakh crore of development spending during 2028-30 and Rs 1.5 lakh crore in the production phase from 2030 onwards. These are figures in the proposal submitted to the Andhra Pradesh government, as reported by ET. The two blocks are large. Chintalapudi covers about 3,000 acres and is estimated to contain 904.94 million tonnes of G-12 grade coal. Recherla covers 5,500 acres and has an estimated 2,225.67 million tonnes of G-13 coal. The estimates amount to 3.13 billion tonnes. Officials told ET the deposits lie more than half a kilometre underground. The biggest economic significance lies in the company extracting gas from the coal without conventional mining. Also Read: Coal gasification key to build long-term resilience against global energy shocks: Experts How underground coal gasification works In conventional coal gasification, coal is mined and brought to the surface before being converted into gas. Underground coal gasification (UCG) turns the coal seam itself into the gasification reactor. Wells are drilled into the underground coal seam. An oxidising agent such as air, oxygen or steam is injected through one well. The coal is partially combusted and undergoes chemical reactions underground. Another well brings the resulting gas to the surface. The main product is syngas, or synthesis gas. It is not the same as natural gas. Syngas typically contains hydrogen and carbon monoxide along with varying quantities of methane and carbon dioxide. Its importance lies in what can be made from it. Syngas can be processed into hydrogen, methanol, ammonia, synthetic natural gas and synthetic fuels. Government documents also identify applications in fertiliser production and as reducing gas for steelmaking. For example, syngas can be shifted to increase its hydrogen content. That hydrogen can be used to make ammonia, which is a major fertiliser feedstock. Syngas can also be converted into methanol. Through methanation, it can produce synthetic natural gas, or SNG, which is essentially methane-rich gas that can substitute for natural gas in suitable applications. This means Reliance does not necessarily have to sell the gas as a fuel. It could use the syngas as a platform for producing higher-value industrial products. Why this matters to India India's dependence on imported gas is substantial. The government said in May 2026 that more than half of India's LNG, around 20% of its urea, almost all of its ammonia and around 80-90% of its methanol requirements are met through imports. That creates several points of vulnerability. Domestic gasification could potentially reduce LNG demand through SNG production. It could provide hydrogen for ammonia and fertiliser production. Methanol production could substitute for imports. Syngas-derived reducing gas could also find industrial applications. The value is therefore broader than electricity generation. Coal is being converted into a gaseous feedstock that can enter several industrial chains. India's import bill for key products that coal gasification could potentially substitute, including LNG, urea, ammonium nitrate, ammonia, coking coal and methanol, was approximately Rs 2.77 lakh crore in FY2025, as per a government release. For Reliance, this downstream flexibility is particularly important because the company already has large refining and petrochemical operations. Its interest is potentially less about becoming a coal producer and more about gaining another domestic source of carbon and energy feedstock. India's coal-gasification mission India has discussed coal gasification for decades, but government policy has become much more aggressive in recent years. In January 2024, the Union government approved an Rs 8,500 crore financial incentive scheme for coal and lignite gasification projects. The scheme covers government PSUs, private companies and demonstration projects. The national objective is to reach 100 million tonnes of coal gasification by 2030. The sector is growing but remains well short of that ambition. The government has been supporting projects involving Coal India , BHEL , GAIL , BPCL , Talcher Fertilisers and private companies. In May 2026, the Cabinet approved a much larger Rs 37,500 crore scheme for surface coal and lignite gasification projects. The government expects the scheme to support projects using about 75 million tonnes of coal and lignite and provide incentives of up to 20% of eligible plant and machinery costs, subject to scheme limits. This is important for Reliance, but there could be a catch. The Rs 37,500 crore scheme is specifically for surface coal and lignite gasification. Reliance is proposing underground coal gasification. Therefore, it should not be assumed that RIL will automatically qualify for the new surface-gasification subsidy. UCG does, however, have separate policy support. The government has had a UCG policy since 2016 and has introduced provisions that encourage gasification of coal in commercial mining. In April 2026, the Ministry of Coal announced the first tranche of coal mine development agreements carrying embedded UCG provisions. The government has also provided a 50% revenue-share rebate for coal used for gasification under specified conditions. That could be economically relevant to Reliance, depending on the terms applicable to its blocks and the eventual project configuration. So the policy environment is clearly supportive of gasification, but Reliance's UCG project may not be treated as a direct beneficiary of every incentive created for surface gasification. How big could Reliance's contribution be? Reliance has not disclosed how much coal it intends to gasify each year or how much syngas it expects to produce. Therefore, there is no company production forecast yet. But the scale can be illustrated. If the entire 3.13 billion tonnes of underground coal were gasified evenly over 30 years, the average would be about 104 million tonnes of coal a year. That is roughly equivalent to India's entire 100-MT national gasification target for 2030. That does not mean Reliance will gasify 104 MT a year. It is simply the mathematical implication of spreading the entire geological estimate over the proposed project life. A more conservative scenario shows why even partial utilisation could matter. If 10% of the estimated resource were gasified over 30 years, the average would be about 10.4 MTPA, or roughly 10% of India's 100-MT target. At 25% utilisation, it would be about 26 MTPA, equivalent to 26% of the national target. These are just scenarios, and not Reliance guidance. The actual number will depend on exploration, recovery rates, gasification performance and economics. The biggest risk is underground UCG's attraction is also its biggest uncertainty. The coal is more than 600 metres deep, which makes conventional mining difficult or uneconomic. But turning that underground seam into a controlled gasifier may create its own technical problems. The coal seam needs suitable thickness, continuity and permeability. The surrounding geology matters. Groundwater conditions matter. Faults and fractures can affect the gasification cavity. Operators must also control gas leakage and potential subsidence. Research on UCG has identified groundwater contamination, gas leakage and subsidence as important risks. Commercial-scale deployment remains highly site-specific. That is why Reliance's first Rs 3,000 crore is more important than the headline Rs 2.73 lakh crore figure. The company first needs to prove that it can create and control the underground reaction and produce a sufficiently consistent syngas stream at an acceptable cost. If that works, the larger development investment becomes credible. If it does not, much of the proposed Rs 2.73 lakh crore may never be spent. Can Ambani's underground bet save India from energy shocks? India's energy demand is expected to rise as industrialisation and household consumption increase. Renewables can supply an increasing share of electricity, but they cannot eliminate the need for molecules used in fertilisers, chemicals, refining, steel and other industrial processes. That means India will continue to need gas and gas-derived products even as its power system becomes cleaner. Coal gasification offers one possible domestic source. If UCG produces economically competitive syngas, India could use it to make SNG and reduce some LNG imports. Hydrogen from syngas could support domestic ammonia production. Methanol could replace imports. Industrial gas could support steel and chemical production. It would not make India completely self-sufficient. Nor would coal gasification eliminate the country's exposure to international energy prices. But it could provide an additional domestic source of critical molecules. That would be a big factor during geopolitical disruptions. A country importing LNG, ammonia and methanol is exposed not just to commodity prices but also to shipping constraints, currency movements and disruptions to major trade routes. The government's own rationale for coal gasification is partly based on reducing these import dependencies. Its May 2026 announcement explicitly linked the programme to lower dependence on imported LNG, urea, ammonia and methanol. .Pbanner{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;background-color:#ec1c40;margin-top:20px;padding:5px 10px;border-radius:4px;color:#fff;line-height:10px;width: 100%;box-sizing: border-box} .Pbannertext{display:flex;align-items:center;font-size:16px;font-weight:600;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannertext img{height:20px;margin:0 6px} .Pbannerbutton a{display:flex;align-items:center;background-color:#fff;color:#ec1c40;text-decoration:none;font-weight:600;padding:4px 8px;border-radius:6px;font-size:15px;font-family:'Montserrat';} .Pbannerbutton img{height:20px;margin-right:6px} .Pbannerbutton a:hover{background-color:#f7f7f7} Add as a Reliable and Trusted News Source Add Now! (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)